Motif Tools
Family atlas / C2H2 zinc finger

Other C2H2 zinc fingers

C2H2 zinc finger168 motifsaka other C2H2 zinc fingers, non-KRAB C2H2 zinc fingers, unassigned ZNF
AGTCAGTCGTCTAGAGCCTCTC
representative: M08388_2.00 · data consensus ccCgGCCTCC
members not one motif · 0.38no single consensus58 in vitro35 ChIP-only2 cross-species11 references, all PMIDs verified

The remainder of the C2H2 zinc-finger class: factors that are neither KRAB zinc-finger proteins nor members of a family with its own entry. Ninety-six named genes appear here, from well-studied cases such as ZNF335, ZNF341, ZFAT and ZFTA to dozens of ZNF numbers with almost no literature. What they share is the fold, and little else: the 168 matrices in this entry are mutually unrelated, with a cohesion of 0.38 and a median length of 12 bp. The evidence behind them is nonetheless much better than for the KRAB group, with 39 of 93 HOCOMOCO models at the top grade and many supported in vitro. A hit here identifies one named protein at best, never a family motif.

The factors

About 700 human proteins carry C2H2 zinc fingers, the largest structural class of transcription factors in the genome, and roughly half also carry a KRAB, SCAN, BTB or SET domain (Vaquerizas et al. 2009; Schmitges et al. 2016; Lambert et al. 2018) 19274049,27852650,29425488. This entry holds most of the remainder that lack a dedicated family: 96 named genes plus two generic archetype labels, heterogeneous in every respect other than the fold. A few are well characterized. ZNF335/NIF-1 is a component of a vertebrate-specific trithorax H3K4-methylation complex. ZNF341 is a nuclear transcription factor that binds the STAT3 promoter. ZFTA, formerly C11orf95, is best known as a fusion partner in ependymoma. Others carry different modules: ZXDA, ZXDB and ZXDC; ZFP64 and ZFP91; ZNF423, a relative of the EBF-binding zinc fingers; MZF1, which has a SCAN domain but is filed here; and the NET-family proteins ZNF503 and ZNF703, with only one or two fingers. Most of the rest, from ZNF16 through ZNF865, received their motifs from bulk C2H2 screens rather than individual study (Najafabadi et al. 2015; Schmitges et al. 2016) 25690854,27852650. Zinc fingers with distinctive, well-mapped sites — CTCF, EGR, WT1, KLF/SP, MAZ, VEZF1, ZNF143, ZNF263, ZNF281, ZNF384, ZNF410 and ZNF768 — have their own entries and are not included here.

The motif

There is no family consensus; cohesion is 0.38 and the representative (CIS-BP M08388, CCCGGCCTCC) is only a centroid. Median consensus length is 12 bp and median information content 13.9 bits, with 59 matrices at 15 bp or more, 33 at 20 bp or more, and 26 above 20 bits. In practice they fall into three groups. First, long element-like matrices: ZNF146 (OZF) CTTTTTTATGGCTGCATAGTATTCC at 41 bits, with ZNF260 giving nearly the same sequence, so those two are not distinguishable; also ZNF280A TCTCTCCAGTGTGAATTCTCTGAT and ZNF121 CCTGGGCAACATAGCAAGACCCC. Second, simple-repeat matrices, which look informative but are not specific: ZNF646 and ZNF865 are both (TG)n at 31 and 27 bits, and ZNF48 is a GA repeat. Third, and hardest, short GC-rich matrices: ZNF740 GTGGGGGGGG, ZNF395 and SLC2A4RG both GCCGGCCGG, ZNF575 GCTGCGGCAGCAG, RLF CCGCCGCTTTT, ZXDA GCAGGGGC and ZXDB CAGGGG. These are near-indistinguishable from one another and from the SP/KLF, MAZ, VEZF1, ZNF281, EGR and GLI motifs, each of which has its own entry. Twenty-one matrices have their nearest neighbour outside the family: four are essentially a KLF/SP GC-box (three ZNF574 models and the archetype AC0466), two the SIX homeodomain motif (both ZNF32 models), two the BCL11 motif (both ZNF296 models), and single cases point to ZNF281, VEZF1, GLI, YY1, EBF, ZIC, PRDM, NFKB, ETS, ETV2/ETV6, posterior HOX and ZNF384. The clearest single case is basonuclin 2: the JASPAR BNC2 matrix is TGAGTCA, the canonical AP-1 site, at 0.99 similarity to the AP-1 entry.

Where it acts

Mostly promoters and promoter-proximal regions. The GC-rich majority lands in CpG islands, joining a crowded pool of interchangeable GC-box models; the small number of long, element-like matrices lands in repeat-rich sequence. Systematic profiling of 166 poorly characterized human transcription factors found that nearly half associate with known promoters and enhancers, often co-localizing at conserved motif matches, while the other half bind largely non-overlapping sites in repeat-rich closed chromatin (Razavi et al. 2026) 42557260. Members of this entry are split across both behaviours and mostly unassigned.

Biology and disease

Three members have clear, mapped human phenotypes. Biallelic ZNF335 mutations cause severe microcephaly with small somatic size and neonatal death; Znf335-null mice are embryonic lethal, the protein is required for neural progenitor self-renewal and neuronal differentiation, and it directly regulates REST/NRSF (Yang et al. 2012) 23178126. Loss-of-function mutations in ZNF341 cause a recessive form of hyper-IgE syndrome: ZNF341 binds the STAT3 promoter, and its loss lowers basal STAT3 mRNA and protein, abolishes STAT3 autoinduction, and removes T helper 17 cells while leaving an excess of T helper 2 cells (Béziat et al. 2018) 29907691. ZFTA is the 5' partner of the recurrent ZFTA(C11orf95)-RELA fusion that drives oncogenic NF-kB signalling in supratentorial ependymoma; the driver is the fusion, not the wild-type factor (Parker et al. 2014) 24553141. For most members here no loss-of-function phenotype has been published, which reflects absence of study rather than absence of function; these are the proteins recent systematic efforts were designed to characterize (Jolma et al. 2026) 42557334.

Reading a hit

Identify the protein, then ask whether the matrix can carry the identification. Three checks settle most cases. Is it GC-rich and shorter than about 12 bp? Then it is one of many interchangeable GC-box models and should not be attributed to a specific protein without orthogonal evidence. Is it a simple repeat, as for ZNF646, ZNF865 or ZNF48? Then it is not a motif in any useful sense. Does it have a high-similarity neighbour in a different family? Twenty-one matrices do, and for those the label should be treated as unresolved. Evidence here is comparatively good: 39 of 93 HOCOMOCO models are grade A and many carry in vitro codes (S or M) alongside ChIP 37971293, so a grade-A model with both kinds of support, such as ZFAT's GCAGATTCGTCA or ZFTA's GTGGCCCC, deserves more weight than a grade-C ChIP-only model such as ZNF711's. Two CIS-BP models, for ZNF652 and ZNF691, are transferred from mouse orthologues at 0.97 to 0.99 DNA-binding-domain identity, a safe transfer 25215497. Finally, because many of these proteins co-localize at the same conserved sites, a match in an occupied promoter does not tell you which zinc finger made the contact.

How this was worked out

  1. 2009mediumcuration of sequence and expression data19274049

    A manually curated census of 1,391 human transcription factors established C2H2 zinc fingers as the largest class and documented how few of them had been studied individually, which is the condition this entry still records.

    Still open then: Binding specificities were unknown for the great majority of the class.

  2. 2012highhuman genetics, null and conditional mouse knockouts, RNA interference, postmortem human tissue23178126

    ZNF335 was identified as a cause of severe microcephaly with small somatic size and neonatal death, shown to be required for neural progenitor self-renewal, and placed in a vertebrate-specific H3K4-methylation complex that directly regulates REST/NRSF, the first clear disease mechanism for a member of this leftover group.

  3. 2014highprotein-binding microarrays, inference by DNA-binding-domain identity25215497

    Measuring preferences for more than 1,000 factors across 131 eukaryotes showed that closely related DNA-binding domains almost always share motifs, which is the basis for the cross-species inferred models that fill out CIS-BP, including the mouse-derived entries in this family.

    Still open then: How far identity can be pushed before a transferred motif becomes wrong was set by convention, not by measurement.

  4. 2015highbacterial one-hybrid, protein-binding microarray, ChIP-seq25690854

    A recognition code derived from thousands of natural C2H2 domains, with protein-binding microarray and ChIP data, supplied motifs for a large share of the proteins in this entry and showed that the class recognizes more distinct motifs than all other human transcription factors combined.

  5. 2016mediumChIP-seq, affinity purification-mass spectrometry, knockdown expression profiling27852650

    Direct functional analysis of 131 C2H2 proteins produced motif models for 78 that had none and found that their co-activator and co-repressor partners are nearly as diverse as their motifs, so members of this group share neither a site nor an effector mechanism.

  6. 2018highhuman genetics, patient cells, reporter and binding assays29907691

    Loss-of-function mutations in the previously uncharacterized ZNF341 were shown to cause a recessive hyper-IgE syndrome, with ZNF341 binding the STAT3 promoter and its loss abolishing STAT3 autoinduction, demonstrating that an unstudied zinc finger can carry a specific, non-redundant regulatory role.

  7. 2026highmultiple in vitro and in vivo binding assays; ChIP-seq in living cells42557334 42557260

    Systematic characterization gave motifs for 177 of 332 poorly characterized human factors, while in-cell profiling of 166 of them found about half at promoters and enhancers, frequently co-localizing with each other at the same conserved motif matches, and the rest at unique repeat-rich sites in closed chromatin.

    Still open then: Co-localization at shared motif matches leaves open which factor makes the DNA contact at any given occupied site.

Still unresolved

How much to trust a hit

This entry is the leftover of a structural class, not a motif: 96 named proteins, 168 matrices, cohesion 0.38, no consensus. Read a hit as naming one protein at best. Short GC-rich members are interchangeable with each other and with the SP/KLF, MAZ, VEZF1, ZNF281, EGR and GLI motifs, and simple-repeat members such as ZNF646, ZNF865 and ZNF48 carry no factor-specific information. Twenty-one matrices most closely resemble a motif from another family; the clearest is the JASPAR BNC2 model, which is the AP-1 site. Evidence is better than in the KRAB group, with 39 of 93 HOCOMOCO models at grade A, so check the evidence code before trusting any label.

References

168 motifs in this family — JASPAR 15 · HOCOMOCO 93 · CIS-BP 42 · Vierstra 18
motifdatabaseconsensusbits
OZF.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOCTTTTTTATGGCTGCATAGTATTCC41
M08332_2.00CIS-BPTCTCTCCAGTgTGAATTCTCTGAT32
ZN121.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOCCTGGGCAACAtAGCaAGACCCC31.2
ZN646.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOTGTGTGTGcaTGTGTGTGTGTGTGT31
ZN260.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOTTTtTATgGCTGCATAGTATTCC30.7
ZN623.H14CORE.0.PG.APGAHOCOMOCOCCtGCCtCAGGGCCTTTGCAC28.3
M08250_2.00CIS-BPTTGTAaGAGCTCTTTATATAT27.9
ZN865.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGTGTGTGTGcaTGTGTGTGTG27.3
ZFP3.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOACTCCTAtTCATCCTTCAAAACC26.7
ZNF16 (MA1654.2)JASPARAaTaGGGAGCCATgGAAGGTT24.6
ZNF70.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOCCTCCTttCGATAGACCtt23.9
ZFP41.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOGCTAACTCTCCGC23.7
ZN696.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGTTAAGAAAGgttCtGAGG23.4
ZN672.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOCGACGGCAGGGGaaTGaC23.3
ZNF16.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOaCCtTCcATGGCTCCCyatTgCC23.3
M04653_2.00CIS-BPGTaCgGTTGtncatGTTGCAA23.2
M08322_2.00CIS-BPAcCATCATCAtCATC23
ZN276.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOTTAAGGTGGTATataCcaCCTTAA22.6
ZFAT.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOccGCAGATTCGtCA22.5
ZN787.H14CORE.0.M.CMCHOCOMOCOtGCCTCAGTTTACC21.5
ZN275.H14CORE.0.SG.ASGAHOCOMOCOGGTGCTAGGGaCcC21.4
M08258_2.00CIS-BPAACTCCTAttCATCC21.4
AC0469:ZNF/ZNF280A:C2H2_ZFVierstraTCTCTCCAGTaTGA20.6
M04597_2.00CIS-BPGCTAACTCTCCgC20.4
ZN648.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOgTCAGCGcncccccnnncccCCCCt20.2
ZN821.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOtGTCTGTCTGTCCg20.2
M08251_2.00CIS-BPCCtTCcATGGCTCCC19.9
M04495_2.00CIS-BPtAAGGTgGactaTACnaCCTTaA19.8
ZN771.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOAATGGTTAGCGc19.4
M04589_2.00CIS-BPgCGCTAACCATT19.4
ZFP91.H14CORE.0.SGI.ASGIAHOCOMOCOgTgtCCCTTTAAGa18.9
M04473_2.00CIS-BPgATGCAcnnnnnnTGCCTC18.6
M08359_2.00CIS-BPCTGGATCaagCCntdCCTGAA18.4
ZN239.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOtgCAGgcCTTcTCAGagCCTT18.3
ZN526.H14CORE.0.S.CSCHOCOMOCOCAAGAGCGGCgcC18.3
M08375_2.00CIS-BPgGCTACTGCAcygGTCC18.3
ZN467.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOggGGgGGggggGGaGGGGGAGGg18.2
ZN740.H14CORE.1.S.CSCHOCOMOCOgggGGGGGGGGGTGcg18.2
M04479_2.00CIS-BPTGATdvCCCAcCCT18.1
ZN142.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOgtGCGGTCGGGCG18
M02938_2.00Mus musculus 0.99CIS-BPTTAACCCTTT18
Znf423 (MA0116.1)JASPARGgcaCCcAgGGgtgC17.9
ZN497.H14CORE.0.SG.ASGAHOCOMOCOaATTGTTCATCCGTTTAc17.9
ZN575.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOgcTGCGGCAGCAg17.6
ZN668.H14CORE.0.SG.ASGAHOCOMOCOCTtTAGGACCCaGsrg17.6
M08325_2.00CIS-BPTTTTTTTTT17.6
AC0592:ZNF/ZNF324B:['C2H2_zinc_finger_factors']VierstraAgCCATCCTTdgCTgcc17.6
Z518B.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGTAGAttTCTAC17.4
M08339_2.00CIS-BPCTCGAACCCngGaCC17.4
M08248_2.00CIS-BPtTTtnTrtCcgCCGACahtaA17.2
ZN502.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOGCtaGGACcggTGCAGTAGCc16.9
ZN770.H14CORE.1.P.BPBHOCOMOCOGGAGGCtGaGGngGGaGg16.9
M04637_2.00CIS-BPcCTACCCtcdcCTACCCt16.9
M08260_2.00CIS-BPcCcCCCcCCCtbCCCCTCCCC16.8
M04467_2.00CIS-BPtgCCCCCCCCAC16.7
M04519_2.00CIS-BPgCCGGCCGGc16.7
ZN618.H14CORE.0.G.BGBHOCOMOCOaAaAaaTTTtAAAaTTthaA16.3
ZN407.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOTACGGagGCCgagaaGGghCA16.2
M08384_2.00CIS-BPCgGGsCaaggcAGCvaGaCCCc16
ZN664.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOTTaAaTGAGctacTAcT15.9
ZN134.H14CORE.1.P.CPCHOCOMOCOGcctbvhCTaATCAGtTGAaGG15.7
ZN784.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOAGGTAGGTA15.7
ZN775.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGkGAGAAtTTG15.5
ZNF48.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOgAGAGAgagagaGAGaCAGAGAca15.5
ZNF574 (MA1982.2)JASPARGgCTAGAGcGGCc15.3
S2A4R.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGCCGGCCGG15.1
ZN134.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOCTaATCAGtTGAaGG15
M08253_2.00CIS-BPGGGgCCCACc15
ZNF35.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOAAAGAGctnhtanAAatcAAhAA14.9
M04412_2.00CIS-BPTGTCtGTCTGTCC14.9
Z286B.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGTAATGAGCttcCC14.8
ZN740.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOGTGGGGGGGG14.8
ZN329.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOCTGGATCCAGCcdtrCCTGaA14.7
ZN329.H14CORE.1.P.CPCHOCOMOCOCCTGGATCcAGC14.7
M08275_2.00CIS-BPTCCCGGGccCC14.7
ZNF740 (MA0753.3)JASPARCCCCCCCCAC14.5
M08392_2.00CIS-BPCdtCACCTGcTgAg14.4
ZFTA.H14CORE.0.PSGIB.APSGIBAHOCOMOCOGTGGCCCC14.3
ZN853.H14CORE.0.SG.ASGAHOCOMOCOGCGCTTaGgG14.3
AC0221:ZNF/PRDM:C2H2_ZFVierstratttttnTTTTTTTTTTTTTtTT14.1
ZN322.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOGaGCCTGgTACwgaGCCtG14
ZN335.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGGGGTCCT13.9
ZN652.H14CORE.0.PS.APSAHOCOMOCOAAAGGGTTAA13.9
ZN800.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGtGaggGtGbgGGTGgggGTG13.9
M08239_2.00CIS-BPGcCkCTCTAGgc13.8
ZN683.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGtGAAAGTG13.7
AC0185:ZFP/ZFP69B:C2H2_ZFVierstraTTTCCAGCCAC13.7
ZN524.H14CORE.0.S.BSBHOCOMOCOGGGTTCGAG13.4
ZN704.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOGCCGGCCGGtg13.4
ZNF32.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOGTAACcTGATAC13.4
M04481_2.00CIS-BPcGTCGCGAC13.4
M08259_2.00CIS-BPGaGcCTGgTACwgaGCC13.4
ZN292.H14CORE.0.PSG.APSGAHOCOMOCOGtgtgtCTGCAGcTGtgtg13.3
ZN358.H14CORE.0.SG.ASGAHOCOMOCOaGtGacCtTGtatakgTcnTT13.3
ZN395.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOCCGGCCGGC13.3
ZN831.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOGGaATCCCC13.3
M08388_2.00CIS-BPccCgGCCTCC13.3
ZN367.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOTTTAAAGGgC13.2
M08236_2.00CIS-BPCCATTTT13.2
M08329_2.00CIS-BPGCTGcaTAgTATTCC13.2
ZN660.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOaTTGATTaCCCaccC13.1
ZN664.H14CORE.1.P.CPCHOCOMOCOTTaAaTGAGca13
M08354_2.00CIS-BPGcvGCTCTCac13
AC0466:ZNF/SP:C2H2_ZFVierstraCTAGAGcGGC13
ZN341.H14CORE.1.P.BPBHOCOMOCOggGggvggnggvgGGAAcAGC12.9
RLF.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOCcGCCGCTTtT12.8
ZN692.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOGGGgCCCACc12.8
ZN827.H14CORE.0.SG.ASGAHOCOMOCOTTTAGGCtC12.8
ZXDC.H14CORE.0.PI.APIAHOCOMOCOgAAACCCCGT12.8
ATMIN.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOgggGgAGgagGCgGggGgAgg12.5
AC0314:ZNF385D:C2H2_ZFVierstraCGTCGCGAC12.5
ZNF652 (MA1657.2)JASPARAAGAGTTAA12.4
ZN580.H14CORE.1.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOCTACCcT12.4
ZF64B.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOgCCCnGGAatCTGyAT12.3
ZN787.H14CORE.1.S.CSCHOCOMOCOTGCCTCGAT12.3
ZXDA.H14CORE.0.PSI.APSIAHOCOMOCOGCAGGGGC12.2
ZNF692 (MA1986.2)JASPARGGGCCCA12.1
ZNF524 (MA2096.1)JASPARCTCGaACCC12.1
FIZ1.H14CORE.0.PSGI.APSGIAHOCOMOCOgTTCGAATcctGc12.1
M04535_2.00CIS-BPGTAACctGAtAC12.1
ZN423.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOGctCCCtGGGGaG11.9
M04609_2.00CIS-BPGCGACGCGAAC11.9
M08310_2.00CIS-BPGCTgTTCCcbccncccccc11.9
ZNF784 (MA1717.2)JASPARACCTACCG11.8
ZNF770 (MA2099.1)JASPARCGGCCTCA11.6
ZN532.H14CORE.0.SG.ASGAHOCOMOCOAAagGGTACc11.6
M08307_2.00CIS-BPTGCccTTTT11.6
ZN516.H14CORE.0.S.CSCHOCOMOCOCCAATGGa11.5
AC0525:ZNF/MAZ:C2H2_ZFVierstraCCCCTCCCC11.5
ZN580.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOCTACCcT11.4
ZN296.H14CORE.0.S.CSCHOCOMOCOTGTCCAcc11.3
AC0518:ZNF/VEZF:C2H2_ZFVierstraCCCCCCCC11.2
MZF1 (MA0056.3)JASPARAATCCCCA11.1
Z280A.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOtGCAGAAGgvAa11.1
ZN770.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOGGAGGCtG11.1
MZF1.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOtGGGGATt11
ZN341.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOGGAAcAGC11
M08232_2.00CIS-BPAcTTCC11
M08352_2.00CIS-BPACCTACCt10.8
AC0609:ZNF/MZF:C2H2_ZFVierstraCAtGTCCCC10.8
ZXDB.H14CORE.0.PI.APIAHOCOMOCOCAGGGG10.7
FEZF2 (MA2341.1)JASPARCCCAGCCT10.6
ZNF341 (MA1655.2)JASPARGAACAGCc10.5
Zfp335 (MA2002.2)JASPARTCAGGCA10.5
FEZF1.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOTGCtCTTTT10.5
ZNF35.H14CORE.1.P.CPCHOCOMOCOaAtAAAgAGC10.5
BNC2 (MA1928.2)JASPARTGAGTCA10.4
ZN574.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOGcCkCTCTaGg10.2
M08395_2.00CIS-BPCtscnThcthtTCC10.2
M04543_2.00CIS-BPgTGGACA10.1
E4F1.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOGCCGGAAa10
ZF64B.H14CORE.1.P.BPBHOCOMOCOgCCCnGGaAtCT10
AC0217:FEZF:C2H2_ZFVierstraTGCcCTTTT10
ZN711.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOccAGGCCnbgc9.9
ZN703.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOTTtATGg9.7
M00142_2.00Mus musculus 0.97CIS-BPGTGCTC9.6
AC0608:MZF:C2H2_ZFVierstraAATCCCCa9.5
ZN503.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOCaCAGCAGG9.1
AC0373:ZNF/ZNF354C:C2H2_ZFVierstracTCCAC9.1
ZNF35 (MA2333.1)JASPARAATTCTA8.7
AC0571:ZNF/PRDM:C2H2_ZFVierstraccbcccCCtCCccccCC8.6
AC0612:MZF:C2H2_ZFVierstraTcCCCCTc8.3
ZN507.H14CORE.0.I.BIBHOCOMOCOCgTTvc8.1
ZN536.H14CORE.0.SGI.ASGIAHOCOMOCOTTAAG8.1
AC0562:ZNF/ZNF37A:C2H2_ZFVierstracccTCC8.1
AC0520:ZNF/EGR:C2H2_ZFVierstractCCCaCaC7.5
AC0563:ZNF/RBAK:C2H2_ZFVierstraCcccTcCTccC6.8
AC0153:ZNF/DMRT:C2H2_ZFVierstraGcTA3.1

HOCOMOCO tags read as assay + quality grade: P ChIP-seq, S HT-SELEX, M methyl-HT-SELEX, G GHT-SELEX, I SMiLE-seq, B PBM; grade A means two or more assay types agreed. A P-only matrix is a record of where the protein was crosslinked, which need not be a sequence it binds itself.

The factors, elsewhere

how this page was made Drafted by a language model reading the primary literature, then checked: every cited PMID is resolved against PubMed and its citation text regenerated from PubMed's own record, and every claim about the motifs themselves is checked against the matrices in the four source databases. Methods and limits →

Other C2H2 zinc finger families