Motif Tools
Family atlas / C2H2 zinc finger

ZIC

C2H2 zinc fingerGACCCCCCGCTGTG24 motifsaka ZIC-binding site, Zic/Gli/Glis superfamily site, CCTGCTGNG
GACGACTGCAACGTCGATGGCTAGCTAGCATGGTCTAGC
representative: ZIC5.H14CORE.0.P.B · data consensus CnCAGCAGGGGGcC
members tight · 0.89stated GACCCCCCGCTGTG · data CnCAGCAGGGGGcC7 in vitro4 ChIP-only1 label conflict15 references, all PMIDs verified

ZIC1 to ZIC5 are five-fingered C2H2 zinc-finger proteins whose DNA-binding domains are the closest relatives of GLI outside the GLIS subfamily, and which read a GLI-like site. In vitro selection gives an optimal ZIC site almost identical to the GLI consensus but bound with lower affinity; modern high-throughput measurements extend it to GACCCCCCGCTGTG, whose reverse complement, CACAGCAGGGGGT, is how several databases write the same motif. ZIC proteins also bind GLI zinc fingers directly and can raise or lower GLI-dependent transcription. They act mainly in dorsal neural tube, neural crest, somites and cerebellum, and human mutations cause holoprosencephaly (ZIC2), X-linked heterotaxy (ZIC3) and Dandy-Walker malformation (ZIC1 with ZIC4).

The factors

The ZIC family has five human members, ZIC1 to ZIC5, each with a tandem array of C2H2 zinc fingers that is more similar to the GLI fingers than to any other vertebrate zinc-finger class. ZIC1 and ZIC4 are a divergently transcribed pair on chromosome 3q24; ZIC2 and ZIC5 are a similar pair on 13q32; ZIC3 sits alone on Xq26 23443491. They bind as monomers. In addition to binding DNA, ZIC proteins associate physically with GLI zinc fingers and, depending on cell type, either enhance or suppress GLI-dependent transactivation 11238441,11053430, so part of their activity is exerted as a GLI cofactor rather than through their own site. Expression is largely neural and paraxial: dorsal neural tube and roof plate, neural crest, somites, and, postnatally, cerebellar granule cells. ZIC2 is also expressed in early epiblast and embryonic stem cells.

The motif

The first systematic definition of the ZIC site used gel-shift-based target selection with ZIC1, ZIC2 and ZIC3 and recovered a sequence almost identical to the GLI binding sequence, but bound with lower affinity than GLI 11053430; consistently, reporter activation by ZIC proteins depended less on the presence of a GLI site than GLI1 activation did, and ZIC proteins activated many promoters lacking one 11053430. Circular-dichroism comparisons of ZIC, GLI and GLIS finger domains on DNA support a shared recognition mode 18298960.

High-throughput SELEX extends the site to a 13-14 base element usually written GACCCCCCGCTGTG 23332764. Its 5' half, GACCCCCC, is the GLIS-like version of the GLI core, and the 3' extension GCTGTG is what distinguishes ZIC from GLI and GLIS in practice. Several databases write the same element on the other strand, as CACAGCAGGGGGT or the shorter CNCAGCAGG, and the ontology form CCTGCTGNG is the reverse complement of that short core; none of these is a different motif. The data consensus here, CNCAGCAGGGGGCC, is the reverse-strand form of the full site. One real subtlety is visible in the collection: the HT-SELEX and methyl-HT-SELEX versions of the ZIC motif differ at a central CpG (CAGCGGGGGG versus CAGCAGGGGG), so cytosine methylation shifts the measured preference at that position 28473536, and different database entries for the same protein can look inconsistent for that reason. No experiment distinguishes ZIC1 from ZIC2, ZIC3, ZIC4 or ZIC5 by sequence; the JASPAR Zic1::Zic2 entry is modeled as a dimer but its consensus is the same short core.

Where it acts

ZIC sites are enhancer elements. In mouse embryonic stem cells ZIC2 occupies thousands of enhancers, both active and poised, and works with the Mbd3/NuRD chromatin-remodeling complex to regulate genes linked to differentiation 25699711; later work describes ZIC2 acting first as a priming factor on closed chromatin during neural induction and then as an activator at established enhancers 42033229. In the cerebellum and dorsal neural tube ZIC occupancy overlaps with GLI-responsive elements, which is expected given the shared core, and ZIC and GLI compete or cooperate at the same sequences. Because the informative part of the site is roughly nine to thirteen bases with a GC-rich core, matches are common in GC-rich regulatory DNA, and the motif overlaps in scoring space with GLI, GLIS and, at the CAGCAGG core, with simple CAG-repeat and E-box-adjacent sequence.

Biology and disease

Gli/Zic factors together pattern the vertebrate neural plate by defining domains of differentiation, with ZIC activity dorsal to the SHH-dependent ventral domains 9634234. Heterozygous ZIC2 loss-of-function causes holoprosencephaly type 5, characteristically with a middle-interhemispheric variant and distinctive facial features 29442327; ZIC3 mutations cause X-linked heterotaxy with complex congenital heart defects and laterality reversal 29442328; heterozygous deletion of the linked ZIC1 and ZIC4 pair causes Dandy-Walker malformation 15338008, and mouse work shows that combined Zic1 and Zic4 loss disturbs several developmental programs in the cerebellar anlage rather than one 21307096. ZIC5 was identified in Xenopus as a neural-crest regulator 23443491. Beyond development, ZIC family members are recurrently deregulated in tumors, most consistently by promoter hypermethylation and silencing; ZIC1, for example, is downregulated by promoter hypermethylation in gastric cancer 19135984.

Reading a hit

Treat a ZIC match as "ZIC family", never as a specific paralogue: all five members share one motif. Then treat it cautiously as "ZIC rather than GLI". The two families were defined on essentially the same 5' core, and separating them depends on the 3' GCTGTG extension, which carries relatively little information; a short or weak match can belong to either, and a ZIC hit inside a Hedgehog-responsive enhancer is as likely to be a GLI site. Note also that a real ZIC effect need not require a ZIC site at all, since ZIC proteins act as GLI cofactors and in reporter assays activate promoters lacking the site. The GC-rich core makes the motif frequent in GC-rich regulatory DNA, so isolated matches are weak evidence. In the data behind this family, one Vierstra archetype labelled ZIC (AC0536) has the consensus GACCACCC and matches the GLI family better than its own; that is the expected failure mode for this pair, not a claim that the label is wrong.

How this was worked out

  1. 1994mediumcDNA cloning, in situ hybridization7931345

    zic is cloned from mouse cerebellum as a zinc-finger gene expressed in granule-cell precursors, naming the family and placing its zinc fingers closest to the GLI fingers.

    Still open then: No binding site had been measured; the GLI similarity was a sequence inference.

  2. 1998mediumXenopus expression and overexpression assays9634234

    Zic2 and Gli proteins are shown to pattern the frog neural plate into alternating domains, Zic2 inducing neural crest and inhibiting neurogenesis while Gli does the opposite, establishing the two as a functionally paired system.

    Still open then: Whether the antagonism was exerted through shared DNA sites or through protein interaction.

  3. 2001mediumEMSA-based site selection with mutational analysis, reporter assays, co-immunoprecipitation11053430 11238441

    Gel-shift target selection gives ZIC1, ZIC2 and ZIC3 a site almost identical to the GLI site but bound with lower affinity, and ZIC and GLI proteins are shown to associate physically through their zinc-finger domains and to modulate each other's activity.

    Still open then: Because ZIC proteins also activated promoters lacking the site, how much of their activity is site-dependent was unclear.

  4. 2004mediumHuman deletion mapping in patients, mouse expression analysis15338008

    Heterozygous deletion of the linked ZIC1-ZIC4 pair is identified as a cause of Dandy-Walker malformation, giving the family its first human cerebellar phenotype.

  5. 2013mediumHT-SELEX23332764

    HT-SELEX extends the ZIC site to a 13-14 base element, GACCCCCCGCTGTG, whose 3' GCTGTG extension is what separates it from the GLI and GLIS versions of the shared GC-rich core.

    Still open then: Whether the low-information 3' extension is used to partition sites in vivo.

  6. 2015mediumChIP-seq, proteomics of associated complexes, differentiation assays25699711

    ZIC2 is mapped genome-wide in mouse embryonic stem cells and found at thousands of enhancers, where it is required for normal differentiation, moving the family from a patterning gene to a measured enhancer-binding factor.

  7. 2017mediumMethylation-sensitive SELEX across 542 human factors28473536

    Methyl-HT-SELEX shows that the measured ZIC preference shifts at the central CpG, so the HT-SELEX and methyl-HT-SELEX models of the same protein differ (CAGCGGGGGG versus CAGCAGGGGG).

    Still open then: Whether methylation-dependent ZIC binding occurs at methylated regulatory DNA in cells.

  8. 2026mediumGenome editing in mESC-derived neural progenitors, ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, transcriptomics42033229

    During neural induction from mouse embryonic stem cells, ZIC2 binds de novo to closed distal enhancers and raises their accessibility at pluripotency exit, then activates a subset of those primed enhancers, so one factor occupies the same sites in two mechanistically different roles; ZIC3 compensates for its loss in the pluripotent state.

    Still open then: What converts a primed ZIC2-bound enhancer into an active one is not identified.

Still unresolved

How much to trust a hit

The five ZIC paralogues are indistinguishable by sequence, so a hit names the family only. The larger problem is the GLI boundary: ZIC and GLI were defined on nearly the same core, ZIC binds the GLI consensus in vitro (with lower affinity), and the two are separated only by a weakly informative 3' extension, so weak matches cannot be assigned to one family. One Vierstra archetype labelled ZIC in these data in fact scores closest to GLI. In vitro entries for the same ZIC protein can also disagree at a central CpG because the methyl-SELEX and standard SELEX preferences differ there. Finally, ZIC can act on GLI-dependent transcription without occupying its own site.

References

24 motifs in this family — JASPAR 6 · HOCOMOCO 11 · CIS-BP 5 · Vierstra 2
motifdatabaseconsensusbits
M04491_2.00CIS-BPGACCCCCCGCTGTGa25
ZIC5.H14CORE.1.M.CMCHOCOMOCOCACAGCAGGGGGTC22.5
ZIC5.H14CORE.2.S.CSCHOCOMOCOCgCAGCGGGGGGTc20.2
ZIC3.H14CORE.2.M.BMBHOCOMOCOCACAGCAGGGGGt20
ZIC5 (MA1584.2)JASPARGACCCCCCGCTGyG19
M04471_2.00CIS-BPGACCCCCCGCTGyG19
ZIC1 (MA0696.1)JASPARGACCCCCCGCTGtG18.8
ZIC1.H14CORE.1.M.BMBHOCOMOCOCACAGCAGGGGGt16.9
ZIC1.H14CORE.2.S.BSBHOCOMOCOCaCAGCGGGGGGT16.2
M04485_2.00CIS-BPaCCCCCCGCtGcGc16.2
ZIC5.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOCnCAGCAGGGGGcC16.1
AC0494:ZIC/GLIS:C2H2_ZFVierstraACCCCCcGCTGtG14.7
ZIC3.H14CORE.1.S.BSBHOCOMOCOCaCAGCGGGGGG13.8
M02912_2.00CIS-BPgaCCCCCCGCtGnG13.6
ZIC4 (MA0751.2)JASPARgaCCCCCCGCtGnG13.5
ZIC3.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOChCAGCAGGrg13.2
Zic2 (MA1629.2)JASPARCaCAGCAGG12.8
ZIC2.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOChCAGCAGGgg12.8
ZIC4.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOCaGCgGGGGGT12
Zic1::Zic2 (MA1628.2)dimerJASPARCAGCAGG11.5
ZIC1.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOCnCAGCaGG11.2
Zic3 (MA0697.3)JASPARCAGCAGG10.6
M08233_2.00CIS-BPCCTGCTGdG10.4
AC0536:ZIC:C2H2_ZFlooks like GLIVierstragACCaCCC5.5

HOCOMOCO tags read as assay + quality grade: P ChIP-seq, S HT-SELEX, M methyl-HT-SELEX, G GHT-SELEX, I SMiLE-seq, B PBM; grade A means two or more assay types agreed. A P-only matrix is a record of where the protein was crosslinked, which need not be a sequence it binds itself.

The factors, elsewhere

how this page was made Drafted by a language model reading the primary literature, then checked: every cited PMID is resolved against PubMed and its citation text regenerated from PubMed's own record, and every claim about the motifs themselves is checked against the matrices in the four source databases. Methods and limits →

Other C2H2 zinc finger families