Motif Tools
Family atlas / Prospero

PROX1 (Prospero)

ProsperoTAAGACG4 motifsaka PROX1, Prospero-related homeobox, homeo-prospero domain
GCTCGACAGAGACTAGCTTCGATACT
representative: M03445_2.00 · data consensus TAAGgCGTCTT
members tight · 0.89stated TAAGACG · data TAAGgCGTCTT1 in vitro13 references, all PMIDs verified

PROX1 is the human counterpart of Drosophila Prospero, and it binds DNA with a module unlike any other homeodomain: a highly divergent homeodomain fused to a conserved Prospero domain, the two folding into one structural unit called the homeo-prospero domain. That unit reads a non-canonical site, TAAGACG, rather than the TAAT core used by ordinary homeodomains, and the Prospero domain both aligns the protein on DNA and masks a nuclear export signal, coupling DNA binding to where the protein sits in the cell. PROX1 is essential for lymphatic endothelium, lens fibre elongation, liver and pancreas development and dentate gyrus identity, and it also works without its own site by tethering to nuclear receptors. A single human gene, so no paralogue ambiguity.

The factors

This family has effectively one member in human, PROX1, a 737-residue protein; PROX2 is a shorter relative with much less supporting data. PROX1 was cloned as the vertebrate homologue of Drosophila Prospero, a pan-neural factor required for proper differentiation of neuronal lineages 7908825,9380747. The DNA-binding module sits at the C terminus and is unusual enough that standard domain annotation does not register a homeobox in PROX1 at all. It consists of a highly divergent putative homeodomain immediately followed by a conserved Prospero domain, and the crystal structures showed that these two regions are not separable: they fold as a single structural unit, the homeo-prospero domain 12429095. The homeodomain region retains a three-helix fold similar to a canonical homeodomain, the Prospero domain is a four-helix bundle, and the recognition helix bridges the two 12429095,15837198. PROX1 binds as a monomer through this unit; it has no zinc fingers, leucine zipper or other dimerisation module. Both the fly and human proteins also act on other transcription factors: Prospero modulates the DNA-binding properties of conventional homeodomain proteins such as Deformed 9380747, and PROX1 modulates nuclear receptors, in both cases through the same conserved C-terminal region that binds DNA but through activities that are formally independent of it 9380747.

The motif

The functionally validated Prospero target sequence is TAAGACG, which is not a homeodomain site: there is no TAAT core, and the bases contacted are read by residues that do not correspond to the canonical homeodomain specificity positions 9380747,15837198. The co-crystal structure of the homeo-prospero domain with DNA showed Lys1290, Asn1294 and Asp1297, invariant across the family, making the specific contacts, and it reconciled two different sequences that had previously been proposed as Prospero targets, the TAAGACG element and a looser SELEX-derived pyrimidine-rich consensus 15837198. The Prospero domain does not itself contact many bases; its job is to align the protein correctly on the site. In vitro selection on human PROX1 extends the site to an eleven-position model, AAGACGCCTTA, whose reverse complement reads TAAGGCGTCTT 23332764; the TAAGACG core of the literature consensus is contained in it, and the extra positions are a weakly specified 3' half that makes the whole thing look like a loose near-palindrome of two AAG-type half sites. All four database models in the family agree on this shape, with a cohesion of 0.89, and the only weak entry is a shortened HOCOMOCO model reduced to CGTCTT 37962376. Because there is one gene, there is no paralogue problem: the motif and the protein correspond one to one.

Where it acts

PROX1 acts at promoters and enhancers of lineage genes in the tissues where it is expressed: lymphatic endothelium, lens, liver, pancreas, heart, lymphocytes and dentate gyrus granule cells. A large part of its genomic footprint, though, is not explained by its own site. PROX1 functions as a corepressor and coregulator of nuclear receptors, including liver receptor homologue-1, the oestrogen-related receptor ERRalpha with its coactivator PGC-1alpha, and the retinoic-acid-related orphan receptors; in these complexes it is recruited to the receptor's own response element 20194433. So PROX1 ChIP peaks are expected to be enriched for nuclear receptor half sites as well as for TAAGACG, and in bioenergetic gene programs the nuclear receptor element may be the only motif present. There is no widely used name for a PROX1 composite element.

Biology and disease

Prox1-null mouse embryos fail to form a lymphatic vasculature: lymphatic endothelial cells do not bud from the embryonic veins, which established PROX1 as the switch for lymphatic endothelial identity 10499794. Forced PROX1 expression in blood vascular endothelial cells reprogrammes them toward a lymphatic phenotype, and this remains one of the cleaner examples of single-factor endothelial fate conversion 12198161. Prox1 loss also blocks lens fibre elongation, causing a cataract-like phenotype 10080188, and blocks hepatocyte migration during liver development 10888866. In the brain, Prox1 postmitotically specifies dentate gyrus granule cell identity in preference to CA3 pyramidal identity 22791897. Through ERRalpha/PGC-1alpha, PROX1 restrains mitochondrial and bioenergetic gene expression 20194433. In cancer the direction of effect is context-dependent and contested; in intestinal tumorigenesis a PROX1-positive tumour stem or progenitor population has been described that contributes to tumour growth 39841093, while other settings report tumour-suppressive behaviour.

Reading a hit

A good TAAGACG or AAGACGCCTTA match is unusually informative for a homeodomain-class family, because the site shares nothing with the TAAT core that hundreds of other homeodomain factors use, and because there is only one human protein that reads it. Two limits. The site is short and only moderately constrained, so chance occurrence is not negligible in a large search space, and matches should be weighted by whether PROX1 is expressed in the tissue at all; it is off in most adult somatic cell types. More importantly, the converse inference fails: a PROX1 ChIP peak with no TAAGACG is not evidence against PROX1 involvement, because much of what PROX1 does genomically is tethered to nuclear receptors. The available models rest on in vitro selection, which supports the statement that PROX1 binds this sequence, and the crystal structure supports it independently; that is a stronger evidence base than most families in this atlas.

How this was worked out

  1. 1993mediumcDNA cloning and in situ expression analysis in mouse embryos7908825

    Prox1 is cloned as the likely mouse homologue of Drosophila prospero and found to be expressed in young neurons, developing lens, pancreas, liver and heart, matching the fly expression pattern.

    Still open then: Nothing was known about what sequence the protein binds, or whether it binds DNA directly at all.

  2. 1997mediumin vitro DNA binding, enhancer assays and deletion mapping in Drosophila9380747

    Prospero is shown to be a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein with preferences unlike those of canonical homeodomains, and to separately modulate the DNA binding of homeodomain partners such as Deformed, with both activities mapping to the conserved C-terminal region but operating independently.

    Still open then: Two different target sequences were in circulation, a defined element and a looser selection-derived consensus, and they had not been reconciled.

  3. 1999hightargeted mouse knockouts with histology and marker analysis10499794 10080188

    Prox1-null mouse embryos arrest lymphatic endothelial budding from the embryonic veins while blood vessel development proceeds normally, and separately fail lens fibre elongation, giving the vertebrate protein two sharply defined requirements.

  4. 2002highX-ray crystallography of the unliganded domain12429095

    The structure of the DNA-binding region shows that the divergent homeodomain and the adjacent Prospero domain form a single structural unit, the homeo-prospero domain, and that the Prospero domain both contributes to DNA binding and masks a nuclear export signal inside the homeodomain region.

    Still open then: The apo structure could not say which bases the unit reads.

  5. 2005highX-ray crystallography of the protein-DNA complex15837198

    The co-crystal with DNA shows the invariant residues Lys1290, Asn1294 and Asp1297 contacting a non-canonical site, with the Prospero domain aligning the protein rather than reading many bases, and reconciles the two sequences previously proposed as Prospero targets; it also indicates that exposure of the nuclear export signal is not directly coupled to DNA binding.

  6. 2010mediumcoimmunoprecipitation, reporter assays and genome-wide location analysis in liver cells20194433

    PROX1 is shown to act as a negative modulator of ERRalpha and its coactivator PGC-1alpha at bioenergetic genes, establishing that a large part of its genomic action is tethered to nuclear receptors rather than driven by its own site.

    Still open then: How much of PROX1 occupancy overall is tethered rather than direct was not quantified.

  7. 2013mediumHT-SELEX23332764

    HT-SELEX on recombinant human PROX1 extends the site to an eleven-position model, AAGACGCCTTA, which contains the TAAGACG core of the literature consensus plus a weakly specified second half, and this model underlies the JASPAR, CIS-BP and archetype entries for the family.

    Still open then: In vitro selection says what the protein can bind, not which of those sites it occupies in a cell.

  8. 2025mediummouse lineage tracing with patient-derived organoids and xenografts39841093

    Lineage tracing in intestinal adenomas identifies PROX1-positive cells as slow-cycling tumor stem or progenitor cells that self-renew, supply multiple tumor lineages and survive irradiation through enhanced DNA damage repair, sharpening but not settling the contested role of PROX1 in cancer.

    Still open then: Other tumor settings report PROX1 as growth-suppressive, and the determinants of the direction of effect are unknown.

Still unresolved

How much to trust a hit

One gene, one motif, so no paralogue ambiguity, and the site is structurally validated by a co-crystal of the homeo-prospero domain with DNA. The limits are elsewhere. TAAGACG is only seven constrained positions, so chance matches are common in large searches and should be filtered by whether PROX1 is expressed. The database models come from in vitro selection, which is good evidence for sequence but not for occupancy. And a large fraction of PROX1 genomic action is indirect: it is recruited as a coregulator by nuclear receptors including LRH-1, ERRalpha and RORs, so PROX1 ChIP peaks are expected to carry nuclear receptor elements rather than, or in addition to, this motif.

References

4 motifs in this family — JASPAR 1 · HOCOMOCO 1 · CIS-BP 1 · Vierstra 1
motifdatabaseconsensusbits
PROX1 (MA0794.1)JASPARAAGACGcCTTA16.9
M03445_2.00CIS-BPTAAGgCGTCTT16.9
AC0271:PROX:ProsperoVierstraAAGgCGTCTT12.4
PROX1.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOCGTCTTg10.7

HOCOMOCO tags read as assay + quality grade: P ChIP-seq, S HT-SELEX, M methyl-HT-SELEX, G GHT-SELEX, I SMiLE-seq, B PBM; grade A means two or more assay types agreed. A P-only matrix is a record of where the protein was crosslinked, which need not be a sequence it binds itself.

The factors, elsewhere

how this page was made Drafted by a language model reading the primary literature, then checked: every cited PMID is resolved against PubMed and its citation text regenerated from PubMed's own record, and every claim about the motifs themselves is checked against the matrices in the four source databases. Methods and limits →