Motif Tools

POU (octamer)

POUATGCAAAT82 motifsaka octamer motif, ATGCAAAT, Oct site
CGATGCATCGAACTATGAGTCTACGTATACGATACGT
representative: POU3F2 (MA0787.1) · data consensus tTATGCaAATt
members loose · 0.68stated ATGCAAAT · data tTATGCaAATt23 in vitro6 ChIP-only3 label conflicts16 references, all PMIDs verified

The octamer ATGCAAAT is the site read by the 16 human POU-domain factors, including OCT1/POU2F1, OCT2/POU2F2, PIT1/POU1F1, the BRN2/BRN1 group (POU3F1-4), the BRN3 group (POU4F1-3) and OCT4/POU5F1. What makes the family unusual is the binding unit: a POU-specific domain and a homeodomain joined by a flexible linker, so the two halves of the site can be re-arranged. The same proteins therefore also form dimers on the PORE and MORE elements and sit next to SOX partners in the SOX-OCT composite elements that control pluripotency genes. Hits matter because octamer elements drive immunoglobulin and snRNA promoters and because OCT4 occupancy of SOX-OCT sites is a defining feature of pluripotent cells. The motif is short and AT-rich, so it is common.

The factors

Sixteen human POU genes fall into six classes: POU1F1 (PIT1), POU2F1-3 (OCT1, OCT2, OCT11/SKN-1a), POU3F1-4 (OCT6, BRN2, BRN1, BRN4), POU4F1-3 (BRN3A/B/C), POU5F1 (OCT4) together with the retrogene-derived POU5F1B locus, and POU6F1/2. All of them use one composite DNA-binding unit, described from sequence in 1988 and named after PIT1, OCT1, OCT2 and C. elegans UNC-86 3215510,2905684: an N-terminal POU-specific domain (POU-S), a four-helix bundle whose helix-turn-helix resembles the bacteriophage lambda and 434 repressors, tethered by a flexible 15-27 residue linker to a C-terminal POU-homeodomain (POU-HD), a conventional 60-residue three-helix homeodomain 8156594,7622033. Expression is class-restricted. POU2F1 is essentially ubiquitous; POU2F2 is lymphoid 2905684; POU5F1 is confined to pluripotent and germ cells; POU3F and POU4F members mark defined neural, retinal and inner-ear lineages; POU1F1 is restricted to the anterior pituitary.

The motif

The core is the 8-bp octamer ATGCAAAT, first noted as a conserved element upstream of immunoglobulin genes 6425835. The 1994 crystal structure of the OCT1 POU domain on an octamer site showed why the site is bipartite: POU-S grips the 5' ATGCA half and POU-HD the 3' AAAT half, the two domains bind opposite faces of the duplex, and the linker is disordered and contacts no bases 8156594. The 3' half is a TAAT-type homeodomain site read in the reverse orientation; POU-S contributes most of the base-specific contacts, which is why the ATGC block is the least tolerant part of the site. Because the linker tethers rather than spaces, the half-sites can be rearranged: two POU domains dimerize on the PORE (ATTTGAAATGCAAAT) or on the MORE (ATGCATATGCAT) using two non-overlapping surface patches, and only the PORE arrangement recruits the coactivator OBF-1/POU2AF1 11136971,11583619. Pooled across JASPAR, HOCOMOCO, CIS-BP and the Vierstra archetypes, this family's consensus is tTATGCaAATt - the octamer plus its usual flanking T - but cohesion is only 0.68, because many HT-SELEX models for POU3F, POU4F and POU6F members report homeodomain-half arrangements (TGCATAAT, ATTAATTATGCA, TAATTA, TCATTA) instead of the full octamer 23332764. Those are configuration variants of one binding unit, not separate specificities 7622033.

Where it acts

Octamer sites are classically promoter-proximal, in immunoglobulin heavy- and light-chain promoters, the histone H2B promoter and snRNA promoters 6425835,7622033. The best-characterized POU enhancer elements are composite: an OCT4 octamer immediately adjacent to a SOX HMG site. OCT4 and SOX2 dimerize in different relative orientations on the FGF4 and UTF1 enhancers, and it is the arrangement of the two boxes in the DNA, not a switch in the proteins, that sets the geometry 12923055. The Vierstra archetype set recovers POU5F/NANOG and POU2F/POU3F clusters, reflecting how routinely these sites are found with partner motifs. Because the octamer is only 8 bp and AT-rich, an exact match is expected on the order of 10^5 times in 3.1 Gb, so the great majority of matches are unoccupied in any one cell type; occupancy tracks which POU class is expressed. Methyl-SELEX places several POU factors among those whose affinity is changed by CpG methylation in flanking positions, although the octamer core itself has no CpG 28473536.

Biology and disease

POU5F1/OCT4 maintains the pluripotent state and is one of the four factors that reprogram human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells 18035408. POU2F2 with OBF-1 drives immunoglobulin promoter activity in B cells, and the PORE-versus-MORE distinction is the structural explanation for that coactivator dependence 11136971,11583619. POU3F2 and POU3F3 pattern the neocortex; POU4F1-3 specify sensory neurons, retinal ganglion cells and inner-ear hair cells; POU1F1 controls the growth hormone and prolactin genes. Mendelian loss of POU1F1 causes combined pituitary hormone deficiency 1509262, and mutations in POU3F4 and POU4F3 cause X-linked and autosomal dominant deafness respectively 7839145,9506947. In cancer, POU2F3 defines a tuft-cell-like subtype of small-cell lung carcinoma 29945888, and POU5F1 is re-expressed in germ cell tumors.

Reading a hit

A good octamer match tells you that a POU factor could bind; it does not tell you which one. The in vitro models for POU2F1, POU2F2, POU2F3, POU3F1-4 and POU5F1 are all the same 8-9 bp 23332764, so treat a hit as "POU family" unless expression data narrow it. Do not read a bare TAATTA or TCATTA match as POU: that is the homeodomain half alone and is shared with most of the homeodomain superfamily, which is exactly why two low-information CIS-BP and Vierstra entries in this family have nearest neighbours in the HOX and Q50 groups. Conversely, a full PORE, MORE or SOX-OCT composite is much stronger evidence, because the spacing constraint is specific. HOCOMOCO ids are informative here: PO2F1.H14CORE.0.PS.A and PO5F1.H14CORE.2.SM.B carry in vitro (S/M) support, whereas the P-only models such as PO3F2.H14CORE.0.P.B come from ChIP alone and may reflect co-binding.

How this was worked out

  1. 1984mediumComparative sequence analysis of immunoglobulin promoters6425835

    The octamer is found about 70 bp upstream of the transcription start of every immunoglobulin gene examined, as ATTTGCAT in light-chain genes and its exact inverse ATGCAAAT in heavy-chain genes, conserved while the surrounding sequence has diverged.

    Still open then: That the element was a binding site for a tissue-specific factor was a proposal, not yet tested.

  2. 1988mediumcDNA cloning, deletion mapping, sequence comparison3215510 2905684

    Cloning of OCT1 and comparison with OCT2, PIT1 and UNC-86 define the POU domain: a POU-specific box plus a homeobox subdomain, about 160 residues, that carries all the octamer-binding activity; ubiquitous OCT1 and lymphoid OCT2 read the octamer indistinguishably.

    Still open then: How two subdomains in one polypeptide divide an 8-bp site between them was unknown.

  3. 1994highX-ray crystallography (3.0 A)8156594

    The OCT1 POU domain-octamer structure shows POU-S on the 5' ATGC half, docked like the lambda and 434 repressors, and POU-HD on the 3' AAAT half, docked like other homeodomains, with an invisible linker and no protein-protein contact between the two.

    Still open then: With no contact between the domains, the source of their cooperativity was unexplained.

  4. 1996mediumQuantitative DNA-binding assays with isolated subdomains8557192

    Unlinked POU-S and POU-HD polypeptides still bind the octamer cooperatively (coupling energy about 1.6 kcal/mol), and the linker behaves as a tether with an effective concentration of about 3.6 mM rather than as a fixed spacer.

  5. 2000highBinding and transactivation assays, mutagenesis; X-ray crystallography (2001)11136971 11583619

    POU dimers assemble in two configurations, on the PORE (ATTTGAAATGCAAAT) and the MORE (ATGCATATGCAT); only the PORE dimer recruits OBF-1, because the MORE dimer interface uses the same OCT1 residues that contact OBF-1. Crystal structures in 2001 showed the two non-overlapping interface patches.

  6. 2003highX-ray crystallography, model building, mutational validation12923055

    A structure of the OCT1 POU domain and SOX2 HMG domain on the FGF4 enhancer element, plus modeling and mutational tests, shows that OCT4 and SOX2 assemble in different relative arrangements on the FGF4 and UTF1 enhancers, and that the enhancer DNA, not the proteins, sets the arrangement.

  7. 2013mediumHT-SELEX23332764

    Systematic HT-SELEX of human POU proteins gives the octamer for POU2F, POU3F and POU5F1B proteins but homeodomain-led arrangements such as TGCATAATTAAT and CTCATTA for POU4F and POU6F proteins, so the in vitro preference of the family is a set of linker configurations rather than one octamer.

    Still open then: Whether these alternative arrangements are what POU4F and POU6F proteins occupy in vivo was not tested.

  8. 2017mediumMethyl-HT-SELEX, crystallography28473536

    Methyl-HT-SELEX across 542 human factors finds that many homeodomain proteins bind CpG-methylated sites differently from unmethylated ones; POU models from this kind of assay include CpG-containing MORE-like variants (for example POU2F2, GAATATGCGCAT) that the canonical octamer, which has no CpG, cannot capture.

Still unresolved

How much to trust a hit

A hit identifies the POU family, not a paralogue: the octamer models for OCT1, OCT2, OCT4 and the BRN proteins are interchangeable at 8-9 bp. The family is only moderately cohesive (0.68) because HT-SELEX returns several linker configurations, and the lowest-information members reduce to TAAT cores indistinguishable from the rest of the homeodomain superfamily; three entries here have nearest neighbours in other homeodomain families. ChIP-derived (P-grade) POU models can capture partner motifs, particularly SOX sites in pluripotent cells. Exact octamers occur roughly 10^5 times genome-wide, so a match alone is weak evidence without expression or footprint support.

References

82 motifs in this family — JASPAR 18 · HOCOMOCO 29 · CIS-BP 15 · Vierstra 20
motifdatabaseconsensusbits
PO5F1.H14CORE.2.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOTTATGCTAATtAgg21.4
AC0091:POU3F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraATGcATTaATTCAT21.4
POU4F2 (MA0683.2)JASPARTGCATAATTAATGAG20.8
POU2F1::SOX2 (MA1962.1)dimerJASPARATTTGCATaACAATg20
POU1F1 (MA0784.3)JASPARCTaATTTGCATAaT19.8
PO3F4.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOCTaATTAGCATAA19.5
PIT1.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOTAATGAGATGCg19.2
P5F1B.H14CORE.0.S.BSBHOCOMOCOTgaATATGCAAATT18.5
PO2F3.H14CORE.1.S.CSCHOCOMOCOaTATGCtAATTAG18.4
PO3F1.H14CORE.3.M.CMCHOCOMOCOTTATGCTAATTAG18.2
PO3F2.H14CORE.2.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOCTcATTAGCATAa18.2
POU2F2 (MA0507.3)JASPARaTATGCAAATtAg18
PO3F2.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOcTCATGAATATTcAT17.9
AC0006:POU3F/POU1F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraTAATGAgATGC17.4
PO4F2.H14CORE.0.S.BSBHOCOMOCOTcATTAATtATTcA17.2
M05473_2.00CIS-BPTAATGAgATGCA17.1
PO4F1.H14CORE.1.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOATTAATTATgCA16.2
M03310_2.00CIS-BPTcATTAATTATgCA16
PO2F2.H14CORE.1.M.CMCHOCOMOCOGAATATGCGCATa15.9
M07976_2.00CIS-BPcCtTTGTtATGCAaA15.9
PO3F1.H14CORE.1.PS.APSAHOCOMOCOctCATGaATAtTca15.4
PO4F3.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOTnAATAATTcA15
Pou5f1::Sox2 (MA0142.1)dimerJASPARCtTTGTtATGCAAAT14.8
AC0090:POU3F/POU1F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraTAATTTATGC14.2
PO5F1.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOcaTTgTtATGCAaA14.1
M07972_2.00CIS-BPtATGCAAAT14
POU3F2 (MA0787.1)JASPARtTATGCaAATt13.8
PO2F1.H14CORE.0.PS.APSAHOCOMOCOTATGCAAAT13.8
AC0088:POU4F/POU5F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraATTAATTATGCA13.7
PO2F2.H14CORE.2.S.BSBHOCOMOCOTtTGCATATT13.6
POU3F3 (MA0788.1)JASPARatTATGCtAATTt13.5
PIT1.H14CORE.1.S.BSBHOCOMOCOATGAATAAt13.5
M03319_2.00CIS-BPatTATGCtAATTt13.5
POU3F4 (MA0789.1)JASPARTATGCaAAT13.4
PO2F3.H14CORE.0.PS.APSAHOCOMOCOGCAAATTA13.4
POU2F3 (MA0627.3)JASPARTATGCAAAT13.1
POU4F3 (MA0791.2)JASPARTGcATAATTaAT13.1
M03312_2.00CIS-BPTGaATAATTaAT13.1
AC0230:POU2F/ZNF:Homeodomain,POUVierstratTgaTTgCATtCvAnT12.9
POU4F1 (MA0790.2)JASPARTGaATAATTaAT12.7
PO6F1.H14CORE.0.SM.BSMBHOCOMOCOTAATGAG12.6
PO6F2.H14CORE.0.S.BSBHOCOMOCOTAATTAG12.6
AC0011:POU3F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraCATbcaaAATgaa12.6
PO2F2.H14CORE.0.PSM.APSMAHOCOMOCOtATGCAAAT12.5
AC0100:POU2F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraTGAATATTC12.5
PO3F2.H14CORE.1.S.BSBHOCOMOCOaTTAATTA12.4
M00362_2.00CIS-BPcTAATTA12.3
AC0007:POU2F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraacATgtaAtTntG12.3
M03315_2.00CIS-BPtTATGcaAAT12
AC0636:POU5F/NANOG:Homeodomain,POUVierstraaTTGTtATGCAAA12
AC0637:POU2F/POU3F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraTATGCAAAT12
POU3F1 (MA0786.2)JASPARtTATGcaAAT11.6
AC0103:POU3F/POU2F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraTATGCGCAT11.6
POU2F1 (MA0785.2)JASPARTATGCAAAT11.5
PO3F3.H14CORE.1.P.CPCHOCOMOCOcaTGcATAtTnAt11.5
POU6F2 (MA0793.2)JASPARCTCATTA11.4
PO3F3.H14CORE.2.S.BSBHOCOMOCOTAATTAa11.4
PO5F1.H14CORE.1.P.BPBHOCOMOCOttATGCAAAT11.4
PO4F1.H14CORE.0.S.BSBHOCOMOCOATtATgCAT11.2
PO3F3.H14CORE.0.P.CPCHOCOMOCOATGcAtATt11
AC0089:POU4F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraTgcATtATtcA11
AC0661:POU6F:HomeodomainVierstratTATGCnnngCATAA10.9
M03306_2.00CIS-BPTATGCAAAT10.7
POU5F1B (MA0792.1)JASPARTATGCAAAT10.6
POU6F1 (MA1549.2)JASPARTAATGAG10.5
M03300_2.00CIS-BPATGcATAaTTaA10.5
PO3F1.H14CORE.0.P.BPBHOCOMOCOATGCAaATt10.4
M02094_2.00CIS-BPTAATTA10.1
AC0012:POU3F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraAbTbTAATTCc9.9
POU5F1 (MA1115.2)JASPARATGCAAA9.8
PO3F1.H14CORE.2.S.CSCHOCOMOCOTAATTA9.4
POU6F1 (MA0628.2)JASPARTAATTA9.3
AC0638:POU2F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraATGCTrAt8.8
AC0017:POU2F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraATTAbcaTAAT8.2
AC0101:POU3F/POU2F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraTGCATAAt8.1
AC0005:POU6F/NKX:Homeodomainlooks like HD_HOX_ANTVierstraTCATTA7.8
AC0102:POU2F/POU3F:Homeodomain,POUVierstraTGaATATgCA7.5
M00377_2.00CIS-BPTGcATAa5.5
AC0024:POU3F/HESX:Homeodomainlooks like HD_HOX_ANTVierstraTAATt4.6
M01509_2.00looks like HD_Q50CIS-BPaatta1.9
M00364_2.00CIS-BPAT1.6
M00360_2.00CIS-BPa1.4

HOCOMOCO tags read as assay + quality grade: P ChIP-seq, S HT-SELEX, M methyl-HT-SELEX, G GHT-SELEX, I SMiLE-seq, B PBM; grade A means two or more assay types agreed. A P-only matrix is a record of where the protein was crosslinked, which need not be a sequence it binds itself.

The factors, elsewhere

how this page was made Drafted by a language model reading the primary literature, then checked: every cited PMID is resolved against PubMed and its citation text regenerated from PubMed's own record, and every claim about the motifs themselves is checked against the matrices in the four source databases. Methods and limits →