Motif Tools

Other bZIP

bZIP2 motifsaka other bZIP, unclassified bZIP, residual bZIP bucket
CTAATACGTATAGT
representative: M01813_2.00 · data consensus aaACGTak
members loose · 0.6no single consensus2 cross-species12 references, all PMIDs verified

This is not a family. It is the residual bucket in which bZIP motifs land when they do not belong to any of the defined bZIP families, and in the current data it holds exactly two entries, both from CIS-BP: a cyclic-AMP-response-element-like matrix labelled CREBL2 that was inherited from a Drosophila protein at 64 percent DNA-binding-domain identity, and a short, low-information ACGT-core matrix labelled CREBZF (Zhangfei/SMILE) taken from the mouse ortholog. The two do not resemble each other, and each is closer to a member of another family than to its bucket-mate. Read a hit here as unassigned rather than as a shared motif, and read the underlying proteins as bZIPs that act largely by partnering with, and destabilizing, other bZIPs rather than through a well-mapped element of their own.

The factors

Only two proteins have a motif model in this bucket. CREBZF, also called Zhangfei or SMILE, is a bZIP whose documented mode of action is not sequence-specific activation but interference with other bZIPs. It suppresses CREB3 (Luman) and CREB3L3 (CREBH), both ER-stress transducers in the ATF6/CREB3 family, and it binds XBP1s through its leucine zipper and triggers its proteasomal degradation, reducing induction of unfolded-protein-response genes 24155933. Depleting CREBZF has the opposite effect, raising UPR transcript and protein levels 24155933. CREBL2 was cloned as a transcript from the chromosome 12p13 interval between ETV6 and CDKN1B, a region recurrently deleted in leukemia 9693048, and has since been reported to interact with CREB1 and to promote adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells 21728997, and to influence metabolism in muscle and liver 31882710. Neither protein has an established DNA-binding specificity determined on the human protein. For scale: the human bZIP class has on the order of fifty to sixty members 12192032,29425488, and the named families in this atlas account for nearly all of the ones with motif models. Several human bZIPs have no model at all in JASPAR 2024, HOCOMOCO v14, CIS-BP or the Vierstra archetypes - ATF5 and NFE2L3 (NRF3) among them - and so appear in no family, including this one.

The motif

There is no consensus for this bucket and none should be quoted. The two entries are as follows. CIS-BP M03649, labelled CREBL2, reads GTGACGTCAT - a cyclic-AMP response element. Its provenance record marks it as inferred from a Drosophila melanogaster protein at 64 percent DNA-binding-domain identity 25215497, and the family data notes that it resembles the CREB/ATF family. CIS-BP M01813, labelled CREBZF, reads AAACGTAK, a short motif carrying 10.8 bits in total, determined on the mouse ortholog, whose DNA-binding domain is 100 percent identical to the human one. The internal cohesion of the pair is 0.60, the lowest of the eight bZIP groups in this atlas, and for each entry the nearest neighbour across all four source databases lies in a different family. In other words the bucket fails the definition of a family used here - a set of motifs it is reasonable to believe are the same motif - and it fails it by design. Averaging these two matrices, or scanning with a single representative for the group, would mix a CRE with an unrelated short ACGT core.

Where it acts

Not established, for either protein, in the sense that matters for a motif atlas: there is no published genome-wide occupancy map tied to a validated element for CREBZF or CREBL2 in human cells. Scanning with the CREBL2 matrix will return the same promoter-proximal, CpG-island-associated sites that a CREB1 or ATF7 matrix returns, because it is a CRE; that reflects the borrowed Drosophila specificity rather than measured CREBL2 occupancy. The CREBZF matrix is short and will match very frequently, and its hits should not be treated as CREBZF binding sites. Where CREBZF does act functionally is at unfolded-protein-response genes, but as a partner and destabilizer of XBP1s and of CREB3-family activators 24155933, so its effect appears at their elements rather than at one of its own.

Biology and disease

CREBZF behaves as a brake on the unfolded protein response. It reduces induction of UPR genes after thapsigargin treatment, an effect that depends on its leucine zipper and on degradation of XBP1s, and knocking it down in primary sensory neurons increases UPR gene expression 24155933. Mouse and cell work has since linked CREBZF to hepatic lipogenesis and steatosis in diet-induced insulin resistance, where it represses Insig-2a in association with ATF4 29637572, to adipose-tissue macrophage inflammation that promotes insulin resistance 38286660, and to repression of adipose browning, with glucose stabilizing the protein through reversible acetylation 38588421. CREBL2 has no disease attributed to the gene itself; the 12p13 region in which it sits is deleted in leukemia, but the deletions are not mapped to CREBL2, and the functional literature is small: CREBL2 promotes adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells 21728997, restrains glycolysis and triglyceride synthesis in muscle and liver cells 31882710, and mediates the effect of miR-195-5p on Schwann cell proliferation and migration after nerve injury 37469605. Neither protein has a knockout phenotype that is routinely cited as defining a cis-element.

Reading a hit

Do not report a match here as a match to a motif. If a scan returns M03649 (CREBL2), read it as a cyclic-AMP response element and report it to the CREB/ATF family, with the caveat that the matrix is a cross-species transfer from an insect protein at 64 percent domain identity and is not evidence about human CREBL2. If it returns M01813 (CREBZF), the match carries little information and no established in vivo target; it does not license the conclusion that CREBZF binds that sequence in human cells. More generally, a residual bucket exists in a motif ontology so that the well-supported families are not diluted by unresolved single cases, and its contents should be read as unassigned rather than as shared biology. If the question is which bZIP is bound at your site, the informative version of that question is which of the named families - AP-1, CREB/ATF, ATF6/CREB3, C/EBP, MAF, NFE2/BACH or PAR bZIP - the sequence best matches, and whether the flanks let you tell them apart at all.

How this was worked out

  1. 1998mediumPositional cloning, transcript mapping9693048

    CREBL2 is cloned as a transcript from the chromosome 12p13 interval between ETV6 and CDKN1B, a region deleted in leukemia.

    Still open then: No DNA-binding specificity or function was determined.

  2. 2011mediumOverexpression and knockdown, protein interaction and co-localization, CREB activity assays21728997

    CREBL2 interacts and co-localizes with CREB and promotes adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells in a CREB-dependent way, pointing to action through a partner rather than a site of its own.

    Still open then: Whether CREBL2 binds DNA directly, alone or with CREB, was not tested.

  3. 2013mediumOverexpression and siRNA knockdown, protein interaction, reporter assays24155933

    CREBZF (Zhangfei) suppresses induction of most unfolded-protein-response genes by binding XBP1s through its leucine zipper and causing its proteasomal degradation; knockdown in sensory neurons raises UPR gene expression.

    Still open then: No CREBZF-specific DNA element was identified.

  4. 2014highProtein-binding microarrays across eukaryotes, DBD-identity inference25215497

    Large-scale specificity mapping shows that closely related DNA-binding domains almost always share sequence preferences, the basis on which CIS-BP infers motifs, including the CREBL2 matrix transferred from a Drosophila protein at 64% domain identity.

    Still open then: Whether the inference holds for CREBL2 specifically was not tested.

  5. 2019mediumKnockdown in C2C12 and Hepa1-6 cells, metabolic assays31882710

    Crebl2, the mammalian ortholog of Drosophila REPTOR-BP, mediates part of the transcriptional response to mTORC1 inhibition and restrains glycolysis and triglyceride synthesis in muscle and liver cells.

  6. 2024mediumAdipose-specific knockout mice, acetylation mapping, human adipose expression38588421

    Glucose stabilizes CREBZF through CBP/p300-mediated Lys208 acetylation, reversed by HDAC3, and adipose-specific loss of CREBZF enhances browning and thermogenesis, with CREBZF repressing thermogenic genes together with PGC-1alpha.

Still unresolved

How much to trust a hit

Treat this as an administrative category, not a biological one. It holds two CIS-BP matrices whose internal similarity is the lowest of any bZIP group here (cohesion 0.60), and both are cross-species transfers: the CREBL2 model comes from a Drosophila protein at 64 percent DNA-binding-domain identity and is simply a CRE, and the CREBZF model comes from mouse and carries little information. Neither protein has a validated human element. A hit in this bucket should be re-reported to whichever named family the sequence actually matches, or left unassigned. Do not build a consensus, a logo or a representative matrix for the group, and do not infer that CREBZF and CREBL2 share a site.

References

2 motifs in this family — CIS-BP 2
motifdatabaseconsensusbits
M03649_2.00Drosophila melanogaster 0.64CIS-BPgTgACGTcAT12.5
M01813_2.00Mus musculus 1CIS-BPaaACGTak10.8

HOCOMOCO tags read as assay + quality grade: P ChIP-seq, S HT-SELEX, M methyl-HT-SELEX, G GHT-SELEX, I SMiLE-seq, B PBM; grade A means two or more assay types agreed. A P-only matrix is a record of where the protein was crosslinked, which need not be a sequence it binds itself.

The factors, elsewhere

how this page was made Drafted by a language model reading the primary literature, then checked: every cited PMID is resolved against PubMed and its citation text regenerated from PubMed's own record, and every claim about the motifs themselves is checked against the matrices in the four source databases. Methods and limits →

Other bZIP families